Mark Cuban’s Wrong: Porn Filtering On YouTube Doesn’t Mean It Loses Safe Harbors
Mark Cuban has a weird obsession with trying to convince people that YouTube is illegal, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary. His latest discussion on the topic is a real stretch. In response to the bad ruling that gives YouTube log files to Viacom, Cuban is saying that Viacom can now wipe out Google's DMCA safe harbors by showing that the company filters porn.
This is simply incorrect. The DMCA safe harbors do not claim that if you filter any material you must filter it all. Filtering out porn is a different beast than filtering out infringing content. You can tell that porn is porn simply by looking at it. But you cannot tell if content is infringing just by looking at it. It could be put up there on purpose by those who own the copyright. It could be fair use. It's not as simple as just saying that because YouTube removes porn it loses its safe harbor provisions. Also, while not specifically concerning the DMCA, other lawsuits involving the similar safe harbors in the CDA have found that intervening with content on a site does not mean that the safe harbors go away. Having knowledge that some content is porn is quite different than having knowledge of what content is infringing on someone's copyright.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
![]()
This is simply incorrect. The DMCA safe harbors do not claim that if you filter any material you must filter it all. Filtering out porn is a different beast than filtering out infringing content. You can tell that porn is porn simply by looking at it. But you cannot tell if content is infringing just by looking at it. It could be put up there on purpose by those who own the copyright. It could be fair use. It's not as simple as just saying that because YouTube removes porn it loses its safe harbor provisions. Also, while not specifically concerning the DMCA, other lawsuits involving the similar safe harbors in the CDA have found that intervening with content on a site does not mean that the safe harbors go away. Having knowledge that some content is porn is quite different than having knowledge of what content is infringing on someone's copyright.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
Recent Entries
- iPosture Makes You Sit Up Straight, Even When You Don’t Want To
- EMI Loses Lawsuit To Prevent John Lennon’s Imagine From Appearing In Expelled
- Press Starting To Notice WiFi-In-The-Sky Claims Not Being Supported In Reality
- Judge Lets MIT Students Share Their Research On Boston Subway Vulnerabilities
- Fox Tries To Kill Watchmen
- Entertainment Industry Again Says Everyone Else Must Protect Its Business Model
- E-commerce: EBay changes aim for fewer critics and more sellers
- Spacewatch
- Has Anyone At AT&T Ever Called AT&T Tech Support?
- Archos launch high spec Wi-Fi media tablets - Archos 5, Archos 7 & Archos 5g