Into Tech

Reuters is running an article about the launch of a new company, Live Autographs, which has stars like William Shatner (who’s an investor in the company) signing autographs for customers, while filming a short video of the signature. As part of the video the stars are supposed to say aloud something in reference to what they’re signing. It’s basically no different than standing in line to get an autograph and telling the person what you want them to sign — except that it takes place over the internet, and the end result is both the signed product and the video. Who knows if it’s a good idea or not, but given the lengths some people will go (or the amount they’ll pay) to get an autograph, it’s hardly a surprising extension of the autograph industry.

But, don’t tell that to one guy. Over at TechCrunch, Mike Arrington not only shows the William Shatner video he requested, but also publishes a message from another company that claims Live Autographs is stealing his intellectual property. Yes, this guy is trying to patent the idea of signing autographs remotely and filming the results. It’s still in the application stage, which you can see right here. Of course, you can’t sue over a patent that hasn’t yet been issued, so the guy doesn’t have much of a complaint yet. But, seriously? Trying to patent filming people signing autographs?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

Last month we reported on upcoming online crime mapping of the UK, allowing people to see exactly how bad things are getting in their local area.

Well, the London Metropolitan Police have been busy since then and you’ll now find a live trial available that uses Google Maps to catalogue burglary, vehicle crime and robbery statistics for the various London boroughs.

It would appear that Google is discovering some of the differences in the legal system in India as compared to the US. Just after we wrote about how Google (along with Microsoft and Yahoo) were sued over ads, there are some stories coming out about how an Indian court has ordered Google to hand over the identity of an anonymous blogger who was criticizing an Indian company, Gremach Infrastructure Equipments & Projects Ltd. While anonymous speech is somewhat protected (within certain limits) in the US, that’s not the case in many other countries. As the link above notes, this may force Google to change the way it does business in India.

In some ways, this is just another example of a problem that many folks have been asking about for years. On a borderless web, how do you know whose jurisdiction covers what? If the blogging all occurred on US servers hosted by a US company, should they be covered by US laws… or Indian laws? Or, even, some other country entirely? If you agree that once it’s on the internet, it can be covered by laws in other countries, you end up with a bad result: the worst, strictest laws suddenly become the laws everywhere. That’s a ridiculous outcome, but it’s exactly where things go when you start suing an American company concerning content hosted in America under laws from another country.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

India unfortunately doesn’t have the equivalent of section 230 of the CDA, which prevents service providers from being sued for the actions of their users. That’s why Google, Microsoft and Yahoo are all facing a lawsuit over certain types of ads in India. Apparently it’s illegal in India to advertise any technique or product designed to influence the sex of a child. However, such ads have been appearing on all three sites. The problem, though, is that the liability should be on those who are actually buying the advertising. They’re the parties who are really breaking the law. Yet, because Google, Microsoft and Yahoo are easier targets (and have a lot more money), that’s who gets targeted.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

We see all sorts of ridiculous lawsuits floating around, but here’s a good one. Eric Goldman has the story of a journalist who was upset about a story written by a local college professor. The journalist felt the story was defamatory, so obviously, he sued Google for $50 billion. Yes, you read that correctly. Pissed off journalist feels that he was defamed by someone totally unconnected to Google… and responds by suing Google for $50 billion. Not surprisingly, the court wasted no time tossing this lawsuit out, and then even slapped the journalist with an order to pay Google’s $12,000 in legal fees. The order to pay those legal fees was later removed on a technicality, but as Goldman notes, it appears that judges are getting pretty sick of these sorts of lawsuits, and are finally beginning to punish folks who are filing them.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

We’re hard pushed not to think that trying to crack the search engine market is a project that’s doomed to failure, but that doesn’t seem to stop people trying.

Google’s ex-employees are trying to do just that with the recently reported Cuil search and someone else is having a go now in the form of Wikia Search.

Californian internet telephony specialist Jajah has clinched an important deal with computer chip designer Intel which will put its cheap-rate telephone service in easy reach of consumers and potentially halt a decline in the take-up of so-called VoIP services.

Under a deal to be announced today, Jajah’s voice over the internet technology will be integrated into a new generation of Intel chips that include the company’s Remote Wake technology, meaning calls can be taken even when a computer is in standby mode.

Integrating the technology into the chip means computer manufacturers, and increasingly broadband providers who want to give PCs away to customers signing up to long-term contracts, can supply machines that can make cheap calls using the web straight out of the box.

Until now, VoIP services, such as Skype, have relied upon consumers downloading and correctly installing software. More than half of all computer users have never downloaded any software from the internet let alone experimented with VoIP.

Jajah has more than 10 million users across the world and is backed by the venture capitalists who put cash into Google and Apple.

The deal with Intel means manufacturers will be able to provide computers that have Jajah ready configured and use the machine’s own microphone, include a handset or even have a phone socket built-in which can be used with any existing phone. Jajah allows users to call any fixed or mobile phone anywhere in the world for a fraction of what they would normally pay.

CNN Alerts

How do I stop them?
John Kirkham

JS: You can’t, but they should be sorted into your spam folder. If not, create a rule to do this. These emails are not really from CNN, though they are a good imitation. Click a link in the latest version, My Custom Alert, and it takes you to a Russian website, where you are asked to download a malware version of Adobe’s Flash player (adobe_flash.exe). This installs a Trojan downloader which runs a service called CbEvtSvc and connects to a remote host. Your anti-malware software should remove this. If not, try running SuperAntiSpyware.

Photos to share

I have used Nikon Fotoshare to send photos by email. It was very quick and easy. Nikon is now offering My Picturetown. This is very slow to upload, and I cannot find out how to email the photos.
Robin Hood

JS: Fotoshare is an online photo album. Nikon plans to close it on September 10 and will then delete all the photos people have uploaded. MyPictureTown.com is similar but has drag-and-drop uploading and is claimed to be easier to use. There are a great many alternatives, including Photobucket (owned by MySpace), WebShots (American Greetings), Flickr (Yahoo), Picasa (Google) and Windows Live Photo Gallery (Microsoft). SmugMug is good but not free.

They all have their fans, many of whom use more than one, so now there is framechannel.com to manage multiple services. There are even more sites that cater for people who want to upload one or two images, such as Imagevenue.com. You can use them without opening an account or signing in. When you upload a photo, these sites usually provide several links to cater for web pages and different types of message board.

Unfortunately, many of these sites make their money by displaying popup adverts, and some may even try to install malware. The best rule is to copy the “direct link” and email that instead of the photo. Avoid any links that contain the letters php.

What’s Kontiki?

I have installed the BBC iPlayer, but every time I activate it, a program called Kontiki pops up.
Denis

JS: When you download TV programmes using iPlayer - as distinct from watching streamed versions online - they are downloaded using Kontiki. This is a peer-to-peer file sharing program, which is also used by similar services such as Sky by Broadband and Channel 4’s 4oD. Kontiki seems to load and use your bandwidth, even if you are not using iPlayer: use the Windows Task Manager to see if Kservice is running.

The BBC has a page that explains how to stop it running on startup and when you are not using iPlayer. You can remove it altogether using the kclean.exe program. However, if you do, any Kontiki-based programs such as iPlayer will stop working.

Printer disposal

I have a not-that-old HP OfficeJet 6110 all-in-one printer/scanner/copier which I’ve recently replaced. It works, but is a little streaky on some printing. I’ve been trying to get rid of it in an ecologically sound way, but to no avail.
Chris Rowbury

JS: You could offer it on eBay, noting the fault and offering it as for “spares or repair” and probably “collect only”. Otherwise, try Freecycle.

Backchat

· Paul Niemiec wanted a cheap way to digitise cassette tapes, and I suggested using the open-source Audacity software. John Blackburn suggests the shareware CD Wave instead: “This software is simpler than Audacity and has the very useful (and, indeed, important) feature of being able to split the music into tracks, either automatically or with manual assistance. CD Wave will save the resulting tracks as WAV, MP3, OGG or FLAC files. WAV is for making audio CDs and MP3 is for the car. FLAC files are lossless, as you say, and are about half the size of WAV files.”

While not enough people recognize it, the real purpose of copyright law is to provide an incentive for the creation of more content. The government felt that there was a market failure, where not enough “content” would be produced without a limited monopoly, and thus, copyright was born. However, that happened back in the day when creating content wasn’t easy. You pretty much had to go through a professional process. These days, thanks to new technologies, creating content is exceptionally easy — and thus, a big part of the very basis for copyright no longer makes sense. We’re drowning in content — and it’s not because of the “incentive” of copyright. There are plenty of incentives for creating content these days and very few have anything to do with copyright.

However, because of that bright line, where copyright was really designed for professional content creators, you end up with bizarre conclusions about how communications should be owned. This stems from the fact that these new technologies have blurred the boundaries between content and communications. Traditionally, professional content was about a one-to-many communication system. However, today, most content is really about many-to-many communication. This isn’t new. Nearly four years ago, we pointed to some early work by Greg Lastowka and Dan Hunter (who are still doing good work in this field) pointing out how copyright law doesn’t make sense for many-to-many communications.

But with that border being made increasingly blurry (and it’s only going to get more so), it’s causing more and more people to recognize how troublesome existing copyright law is — because all it does is hinder that kind of communication. That is, rather than acting as incentive for content creation (as is it’s basic purpose), it’s instead hindering content creation. That’s because it only targets one increasingly less relevant type of content creation, while hindering the increasingly more popular one. This realization is occurring to more and more people, and the latest is Jeff Jarvis, who has come to the conclusion that the “creative class” is a myth. And he’s right. These days, we’re all the creative class — and copyright is holding us back.

I’ve long disagreed with those who say that copyright kills creativity, for I do believe that there is no scarcity of inspiration. But I now understand their position better. I also have learned that when creations are restricted it is the creator who suffers more because his creation won’t find its full and true public, its spark finds no kindling, and the fire dies. The creative class, copyright, mass media, and curmudgeonly critics stop what should be a continuing process of creation; like reverse alchemists, they turn abundance into scarcity, gold into lead.

In the essay, Jarvis also dives into a fuller recognition of the economics of scarcity and abundance:

But we are shifting, too, from a culture of scarcity to one of abundance. That is the essence of the Google worldview: managing abundance. So let’s assume that instead of a scarcity there is an abundance of talent and a limitless will to create but it has been tamped down by an educational system that insists on sameness; starved by a mass economic system that rewarded only a few giants; and discouraged by a critical system that anointed a closed, small creative class. Now talent of many descriptions and levels can express itself and grow. We want to create and we want to be generous with our creations. And we will get the attention we deserve. That means that crap will be ignored. It just depends on your definition of crap.

Welcome to the party, Jeff.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

If a compact digital camera is no longer doing the job and you don’t want to go as far as a digital SLR, then the Coolpix P6000 could fit the bill. This is a top of the line super compact, choc full of features and functionality that you don’t normally find in a compact.

For instance, this is a 13.5 megapixel (MP) snapper with a 4x optically stabilised zoom, built-in GPS, a pop-up flash, optical viewfinder for easy composition, Ethernet port and a new RAW file format which will be compatible with Nikon ViewNX Software. GPS means you can geotag your photos with the location they were shot - just in case you were too drunk to remember and need to look it up later on Google Maps.

Picturetown support means that users can upload their shots directly from the camera via an Ethernet cable to the ’secure’ Picture Bank on Nikon’s free Picturetown online site.

Bill Giordano, general manager marketing, Coolpix for Nikon said: